vaccine debate

As measles outbreaks spread across the U.S., our new look at how information; about vaccine safety and reliability spreads online suggests that the tide may be turning against the anti-vaccination movement. Between Jan. 1 and March 28, 387 people contracted measles in 15 U.S. states. Mumps is also coming back, with 151 infections in just the first two months of 2019.  Both of these dangerous and deadly diseases can be prevented; by getting the MMR vaccine, which is so safe and effective, and so widely used, that measles was declared eliminated from the U.S. in 2000.
But more recently, new outbreaks have struck areas with large pockets of unvaccinated people. Many states allow parents not to vaccinate their children if they have religious or philosophical beliefs against immunizations. Online disinformation campaigns are spreading false claims about vaccine dangers, boosting the numbers of people seeking those exemptions – and inviting disease into their homes and communities. The research lab has spent years tracking the spread of misinformation on social media, including about vaccine safety and effectiveness. The most recent update of the data has found that pro-vax information and activity is beginning to push back against, and even overtake, anti-vax disinformation.

Mapping the spread of vaccine (mis)information

In 2016, we mapped the online debate around a 2015 California bill; that eliminated the personal-belief exemption to mandatory vaccination rules. They found that several of the most-retweeted accounts; using the bill’s main hashtag #SB277; highly automated, appearing to come from bots. So, they took a random sampling of 10 percent of the public tweets during that time period. They identified 41,998 posts containing the most popular pro- and anti-vax hashtags. They then classified the 27,590 accounts that generated those tweets as pro-vax (blue) or anti-vax (green) based on whether each one used more hashtags from one side or the other.

We used retweets to visualize the diffusion of vaccine information. A node represents a Twitter account; a link from @alice to @bob indicates one or more vaccine-related retweets of @alice by @bob. We then mapped the largest network of connected accounts for each of four six-month intervals. The two communities of pro- and anti-vax information are quite segregated in the network; indicating that the accounts in one group do not generally retweet messages from the other. In the last year, however, we observe some blue nodes connected to the green clusters; suggesting that pro-vax information is beginning to penetrate the anti-vax community.

Anti-vax misinformation

On the anti-vax side, one account dominates all the others; @LotusOak, which gave as its full name “Vira Burnayeva.” That account suspended by Twitter in late 2018 or early 2019. Interestingly, another account @ViraBurnayeva (full name “LotusOak”) that posts similar anti-vax misinformation and propaganda is currently among the most influential anti-vax nodes.  The names suggest this account; controlled by the same source, illustrating how easy it can be to circumvent social media companies’ efforts to curb vaccine misinformation. We have found some possible signs of good news: Initially most of the information on Twitter; dominated by people who opposed vaccinations.

But in 2017, the scenario appears to have reversed: Anti-vaccine content is; now shared only by a minority of users. In late 2016, the anti-vax movement was much larger than the pro-vax movement. Over time, the pro-vax movement expanded and now dwarfs the anti-vaxxers. Credit: Filippo Menczer and Pik-Mai Hui, Indiana University, CC BY-ND. If that preliminary finding is confirmed by other research, it could provide evidence that the combined efforts of social media platforms, health organizations, public policy campaigns and grassroots advocacy may eventually overcome anti-vax junk science.