Pregnancy

“Our findings give no support to a general freeze-all strategy in normally menstruating women,” said investigator Dr. Sacha Stormlund from Copenhagen University Hospital in Denmark; who presents the results today at the 35th Annual Meeting of ESHRE. “The results of this trial were as we expected,” said Dr. Stormlund, ‘namely; to see similar pregnancy rates between the fresh and freeze-all treatment groups. So I think it can now plausibly he said that there is no indication for a general freeze-all strategy in women; with regular menstrual cycles who are not at immediate risk of over stimulation in IVF.”

Behind the study lies an increasingly adopt strategy in assist reproduction to freeze all embryos generate; in a first cycle and transfer them after thawing in a later cycle. But some recent reports from registries in Japan and USA have suggest that there are now more frozen embryo transfers in IVF than fresh; with numbers still growing and many clinics claiming that outcomes can be improve with a freeze-all approach. However, despite the enthusiasm of clinics; most study results investigating the freeze-all vs fresh controversy have been inconsistent in their results.

Pregnancy per randomize patient

This study, which aim to test the claim of improve outcome in a general IVF patient population; was a large randomize trial involving 460 IVF patients at eight clinics in Denmark; Sweden and Spain and power to provide a robust result. However, the patients were randomly assign to test the two different treatment approaches; both of them with single blastocyst transfer: freeze-all with frozen embryo transfer in a subsequent cycle versus the control group with fresh transfer.

But results show that the ongoing pregnancy per randomize patient; after the first single blastocyst transfer was similar in the two groups: 26.1% in the freeze-all group and 28.8% in the fresh transfer group; a statistically non-significant difference suggesting that a general freeze-all policy will bring no patient benefit in terms of pregnancy outcome. Live birth rates were also comparable.

“I think we can now reasonably say, based on our results and those from other recent trials; that in normally ovulating patients there is no apparent benefit from a freeze-all strategy in IVF,” said Dr. Stormlund. “However, the evidence derive from another large trial in women with polycystic ovary syndrome; and at risk of responding excessively to stimulation suggests a considerable freeze-all benefit; both in terms of live birth and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.”

Mature eggs was trigger

The latter component of safety was an additional secondary endpoint to the study. However, in the freeze-all cycles ovulation of the mature eggs was trigger with a reproductive hormone-suppressing drug known as a GnRH agonist; in the conventional fresh transfer group ovulation was trigger traditionally with hCG. And in this part of the study there was an apparent patient benefit from the freeze-all approach in terms of patient safety. However, twenty-five of the 220 patients in the fresh transfer group were judge at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) towards the end of their treatment cycle and, to remove the risk, they were switch to the freeze-all group.

“The occurrence of OHSS was not systematically assess in women allocate to the freeze-all group,” explains Dr. Stormlund, ‘as any risk in this group was practically eliminated. Indeed, there were no signs of OHSS in the freeze-all group. The 25 patients judged at high risk of OHSS in the fresh transfer group were swopped from the fresh to the freeze-all group as a safety measure and according to trial protocol.”

The latest European figures from ESHRE put the reported incidence of OHSS at 0.3%, making it the most common complication of IVF. “However,” said Dr. Stormlund, ‘in a recent study from our group in Denmark, we found a considerably higher rate of severe OHSS of 5.1%. That’s why in this study we aimed to reduce the risk of OHSS with a freeze-all plan with GnRH trigger and a cancellation policy in the fresh embryo transfer group for women at high risk of OHSS.”