Cesarean Section

The study does not indicate that cesarean section deliveries cause autism or ADHD. The truth is much more difficult to decipher, and provides an excellent case study for the old adage that correlation does not equal causation. Autism and ADHD are what they call neurodevelopmental disorders. This means they have clear differences in behavioral development, which they presume are due to brain differences.

In the case of autism, behavioral differences occur in the part of the brain primarily responsible for social; and communication development. For ADHD, these differences affect the ability to control and direct attention. The exact reasons why the brain develops differently are not entirely clear. Studies in twins, which are able to help us understand the role of genetic and environmental influences on a given trait, have shown that both autism and ADHD involve a large genetic component.

However, these studies have also indicated that environmental influences; such as bacterial or viral infections during pregnancy, may play a role in the development of these conditions, most likely through interactions with genetic make-up. The association between certain cesarean sections and autism has been known for close to two decades. Any possible link with ADHD has received comparatively less research; but there have still be numerous studies in this area.

Children born via cesarean section

Today’s study, published in the journal JAMA Network Open; combines all of the studies conducted previously into a single analysis. This “meta-analysis” then allows the researchers to come up with a single estimate of how strong the association between cesarean sections; autism and ADHD may be. In this case, the meta-analysis included over 20 million people. It found children born via cesarean section had an increase in odds of being diagnosed with autism or ADHD in early childhood.

The associations were scientifically robust, but very small. Children delivered via cesarean section were 1.33 times more likely to be diagnosed; with autism and 1.17 times more likely to be diagnosed with ADHD. When the prevalence of these conditions is already relatively low (around 1% for autism, and 7% for ADHD); this increase in odds is not substantial. In the instance of autism, this is a shift in odds from a 1% prevalence to 1.33%. This shift is not consequential and certainly does not call for any change in our clinical practice. This association was similar for children born by either elective or emergency cesarean section.

The temptation with findings like this is to draw a causal link between one factor (cesarean section); and the other (autism or ADHD). Unlike so many other areas of science; the conclusions are easily understood and the implications appear obvious. But the simplicity is deceptive, and says more about our desire for simple answers than it does about the truth of the science. The studies included in this meta-analysis used a branch of science called epidemiology, which is concerned with how often conditions; and diseases occur in different groups of people and why, and how to prevent or manage them.

People with autism or ADHD

Epidemiological studies survey a large population and find a pattern of results that indicate a certain factor may be coinciding with a certain disease more often than they would expect by chance. In this case, there is the observation that people with autism or ADHD are more likely to be born by cesarean section than they would otherwise typically expect. But this kind of epidemiological study is unable determine if one factor (cesarean section) causes another (ADHD or autism). There are two key reasons why.

First, they can not rule out that a third factor may be influencing this association. They know, for example, that cesarean sections are more common for pregnant women who are obese and older; and who have a history of immune conditions such as asthma. All of these factors have also linked with an increased chance of having a child with autism; and it is entirely possible and some would argue, probable that it is more likely these factors underlie the relationship between cesarean section and neurodevelopmental disorders.

The second reason is that these kind of epidemiological studies are unable to provide what scientists call “a mechanism” that is, a biological explanation as to why this association may exist. A mechanism study in this area may be to explore biological differences in newborns either born via vaginal or cesarean delivery; and understand how these differences may lead to atypical behavioral development. Without a strong body of evidence from these kinds of studies, there is simply no scientific basis for concluding a causal link between cesarean section and neurodevelopmental disorders.