Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently announced that India wants to offer free coverage for over half a billion of its poorest citizen. The new insurance scheme — dubbed “Modicare” — will cover 100 million of the country’s lowest-income families. Each will receive services equivalent to the sizeable sum of 500,000 rupees (roughly $6,900) per year to treat serious ailments.
The program mainly addresses secondary and third healthcare. For primary care — basic services usually provided by general practitioners or nurses — the government plans to open 150,000 “health and wellness” centers, staffed by nurses, traditional medicine healers, and other health workers, by 2020.
Healthcare, or votecare?
“Indian healthcare is poised for a great leap forward with Ayushman Bharat – which will insure over 50 crore [500 million] citizens,” tweeted Health Minister Jagat Prakash Nadda, referring to the program by its official name, “Long Life India”.
The initiative is without a doubt very good news for India, whose public health system experiences systematic shortages of facilities and doctors, forcing many to opt for private healthcare.
A private consultation, however, can cost up to 1,000 rupees (about $15), which is a very high bill for the millions of locals living on under $2 a day. Government estimations also show that around 60% of the average Indian family’s spending goes towards buying medicine and wider healthcare services.
Many of the country’s poorest, thus, make do without visiting a doctor, with disastrous consequences. For these people, Modicare could be a game- (and life-) changer.
The British medical journal Lancet praised the ambitious scope behind the program in a recent editorial, writing that “setting up such a program has undoubtedly required heroic efforts.”
The initiative, however, is not without its critics. There are fears that increased demand created by Modicare would place an even greater strain on India’s already-faltering health infrastructure. It also is expected to drain the central and 29 state governments $1.6 billion per year in total. Funding will also be gradually increased should demand increase.
Cost is one of the central points of discussion around the scheme. Critics are skeptical that the government will be able to actually fund such a huge system, accusing Modi’s government of trying to use Modicare to draw in votes ahead of the next elections, which will be held in May.
Healthcare providers themselves are concerned over Modicare which, they say, severely underestimates the cost of certain treatments. What’s more, they are worried that private insurance companies will rake in the benefits while the public and the public health system will be left to bear the costs:
“This is going to be another scam. It will benefit only private insurance companies. The citizen of the country will realise later that it is nothing but an election gimmick,” said Sanjay Nirupam from India’s Congress Party, the main opposition party.
Focus and Fine-tuning
Prathap Reddy, chairman of private hospital chain Apollo Hospitals, believes the private sector is “rightly worried” about pricing and reimbursements. “While we all work together to ensure the success of this scheme, there are areas that need focus and fine-tuning,” he said.
Still, others say that Modicare should have aimed to provide day-to-day healthcare for the people, instead of focusing just on secondary and tertiary care for more serious and long-term treatment as it does now.
“Modicare does not extend to primary healthcare, which, we believe, is the weakest link in the provision of public health in India,” Rajiv Lall and Vivek Dehejia of the IDFC Institute think-tank said in a column for the Mint newspaper.
Hopefully, Modicare surprises everybody and enjoys a resounding success. A recent study showed that substandard healthcare was responsible for an estimated 1.6 million deaths a year in India, the highest number anywhere in the world.