A study aims to decipher the profiles of the European adolescents and young adults who have embraced the cause of radical Islamism and to define the role of psychiatry in dealing with this issue. Compared to previous groups such as Al-Qaïda, ETA, or Hamas, which have been studied in the past, today's radical groups are smaller, less hierarchical, and are mainly composed of young, homegrown individuals. The study was published in European Psychiatry.
This review delves into the profiles of today's European adolescents and young adults who have embraced the cause of radical Islamism and looks into the role that psychiatry can play in dealing with this issue. This study presents two major findings: there are no specific psychological or social pathology profiles that are unique to the radicalized youth, and similarities do exist between the psychological manifestations of adolescence and the factors that make individuals vulnerable to the radicalization process.
Studies with empirical data are limited, and radicalization criteria vary from one study to another. Therefore, it was essential to better define radicalization, look more carefully at the population examined, and focus on the growing incidence of the radicalization phenomenon. Taking these parameters into account is critical for preventing radicalization more effectively in the future.
The study focused on adolescents and young adults in Western Europe who have embraced the cause of radical Islamism since 2010.
Our comprehensive review of leading multidisciplinary research suggests that adolescent psychopathology plays a role in the radicalization process, although there is no unique profile, and psychotic disorders are rare among this population.
The study details the dynamic of how adolescent mechanisms and radical influences can dovetail in vulnerable individuals: The turbulence and personal uncertainty that characterizes an adolescent's experience, when combined with triggering events, can leave them more open to extremist groups and ideology.
The sense of purpose, belonging, and moral certainty of these groups may at first ease the discomfort of separation and individuation conflicts that often occur at this stage of life. Using the multiple risk factors found in the research they reviewed, the investigators developed a comprehensive three-level model to explain the phenomenon of radicalization among young Europeans, with a view towards guiding the development of more effective prevention programs.
In addition to adolescence itself, risk factors can include a psychiatric condition, psychological vulnerability, abandonment issues, perceived injustice, and personal uncertainty.
The three-level model offers a holistic, multidisciplinary approach to bring together the different fields working together in the fight against the radicalization phenomena. One single field of knowledge inevitably provides an incomplete panorama and cannot account for the complexity of this phenomenon. Prevention of radicalization should consider each level of risk factors to develop the most tailored and effective interventions.
Despite the rarity of psychotic disorders found among the radicalized youth, the similarities between psychopathological manifestations of adolescence and mechanisms at stake during the radicalization process underline the specific role of mental health professionals.
They suggest that mental health professionals can effectively intervene to help young people to understand the meaning of radical commitment and the personal needs it serves. These professionals can also become involved in deradicalization programs by offering adolescent minds a way out of the radical commitment.